Every coaching engagement begins with a chemistry conversation between coach and coachee. Chemistry is a real prerequisite for coaching to work — the coachee has to trust the coach, the coach has to be genuinely equipped to serve the coachee, and both parties have to make an honest read on fit before scoping the engagement.
Where fit is established, we move to structured assessment. For individual coaching, this means 360 feedback, executive assessment instruments, and structured interviews with peers and direct reports. For team engagements, assessment includes structured interviews with team members and observation of team meetings and decision processes. For cohort and organizational programs, assessment is calibrated to program scope. Assessment establishes the baseline against which the engagement measures its progress.
Coaching engagements run at defined cadence — typically bi-weekly for individual coaching, at rhythms calibrated to team or cohort needs for other engagements. Confidentiality between coach and coachee is absolute. Where an organizational sponsor is involved, sponsor arrangements — including what feedback the sponsor receives about goals and progress reviews — are agreed upfront before the engagement begins. This protects the developmental integrity of the work while ensuring the sponsor gets what they need to justify the investment.
Both partners share responsibility for the practice. On coaching engagements, one partner serves as primary coach; the other engages where the work specifically calls for it. On team engagements, both partners typically work together. On organizational engagements, primary responsibility is calibrated to the specific work and the client relationship.